Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 24, Issue 3 , Pages 261-276, June 2010

The preoperative assessment of obstetric patients

  • Anelia Hinova, FCRA (Research Fellow in Obstetric Anaesthesia)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesia, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK
  • ,
  • Roshan Fernando, FCRA (Consultant Anaesthetist and Honorary Senior Lecturer)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesia, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2BU, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 8451 555 000; Fax: 44 207 380 9604.

published online 31 December 2009.

The importance of early identification and management of the high-risk obstetric patient is emphasised in the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH) report. High-risk patients who need anaesthetic input include those with airway problems, cardiorespiratory disease and rare genetic conditions, such as malignant hyperthermia and suxamethonium apnoea. Anaesthetic options for labour analgesia as well as anaesthesia for operative delivery will need to be discussed in detail with the patient if a delivery management plan is to be constructed. Input from other medical teams, such as cardiologists or haematologists, are often needed. Ultimately, these measures should reduce maternal morbidity and mortality.

Keyword: pre-assessment anaesthesia

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-6934(09)00153-9

doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.12.003

Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 24, Issue 3 , Pages 261-276, June 2010