Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 24, Issue 3 , Pages 289-302, June 2010

The effects of maternal labour analgesia on the fetus

  • Felicity Reynolds, MBBS, MD, FRCA, FRCOG (ad eundem Emeritus Professor of Obstetric Anaesthesia)

      Affiliations

    • Of the on-time United Medical and Dental Schools of Guys and St Thomas’ Hospitals, now no longer in existence and swallowed up by King’s College London.

Anaesthetic Department, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK

published online 30 November 2009.

Maternal labour pain and stress are associated with progressive fetal metabolic acidosis. Systemic opioid analgesia does little to mitigate this stress, but opioids readily cross the placenta and cause fetal-neonatal depression and impair breast feeding. Pethidine remains the most widely used, but alternatives, with the possible exception of remifentanil, have little more to offer. Inhalational analgesia using Entonox is more effective and, being rapidly exhaled by the newborn, is less likely to produce lasting depression. Neuraxial analgesia has maternal physiological and biochemical effects, some of which are potentially detrimental and some favourable to the fetus. Actual neonatal outcome, however, suggests that benefits outweigh detrimental influences. Meta-analysis demonstrates that Apgar score is better after epidural than systemic opioid analgesia, while neonatal acid-base balance is improved by epidural compared to systemic analgesia and even compared to no analgesia. Successful breast feeding is dependent on many factors, therefore randomized trials are required to elucidate the effect of labour analgesia.

Keywords: labour analgesia, pethidine, opioids, neuraxial analgesia, epidural analgesia, local anaesthetics, neonatal welfare, umbilical artery acid-base balance, breast feeding

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-6934(09)00141-2

doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.11.003

Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 24, Issue 3 , Pages 289-302, June 2010