Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 23, Issue 6 , Pages 809-818, December 2009

Fetal growth screening by fundal height measurement

  • Kate Morse, Bsc (Hons) DPSM RM RGN (Specialist Midwife)
  • ,
  • Amanda Williams, MSc Dip HE RM RGN (Specialist Midwife)
  • ,
  • Jason Gardosi, MD FRCOG FRCSED (Professor)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 121 6873400; fax: +44 121 6873401.

West Midlands Perinatal Institute, Birmingham B6 5RQ, UK

published online 12 October 2009.

Fundal height assessment is an inexpensive method for screening for fetal growth restriction. It has had mixed results in the literature, which is likely to be because of a wide variety of methods used. A standardised protocol of measurement by tape and plotting on customised charts is presented, which in routine practice has shown to be able to significantly increase detection rates, while reducing unnecessary referral for further investigation. Fundal height measurement needs to be part of a comprehensive protocol and care pathway, which includes serial assessment, referral for ultrasound biometry and additional investigation by Doppler as required.

Keywords: fundal height, symphysio-fundal height, customised charts, ultrasound scan, fetal biometry, uterine artery Doppler

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-6934(09)00118-7

doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.09.004

Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 23, Issue 6 , Pages 809-818, December 2009