Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 23, Issue 6 , Pages 741-749, December 2009

Intrauterine growth restriction: new standards for assessing adverse outcome

  • Jason Gardosi, MD FRCOG FRCSED (Professor)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +44 121 6873400; fax: +44 121 6873401.

West Midlands Perinatal Institute, Birmingham B6 5RQ, UK

published online 09 October 2009.

The study of associations between intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and adverse outcome benefits from the use of a birthweight standard which is based on customised growth potential. Its application is able to retrospectively quantify the strength of the link with IUGR, whether fetal growth problems were identified antenatally or not. Furthermore, growth failure hitherto unrecognised by conventional standards, such as the average size but relatively small babies of mothers with high body mass index, identify IUGR as a cause of the increased perinatal mortality risk in obese pregnancies. Fetal growth restriction is found to be a frequent antecedent of perinatal morbidity and mortality, pointing to the need to improve its timely antenatal detection as a mainstay of management and prevention.

Keywords: fetal growth, intrauterine growth restriction, small for gestational age, birthweight, customised centiles, stillbirth, perinatal mortality, perinatal morbidity

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-6934(09)00114-X

doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.09.001

Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 23, Issue 6 , Pages 741-749, December 2009