Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 23, Issue 6 , Pages 833-844, December 2009

Detection of foetal growth restriction using third trimester ultrasound

  • Leanne Bricker, MB Bch, MRCOG (Consultant in Fetal and Maternal Medicine and Co-Director of the Fetal Medicine Unit)

      Affiliations

    • Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Crown St, Liverpool, L8 7SS, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 151 708 9988; Fax: +44 151 702 4255.
  • ,
  • Samina Mahsud-Dornan, MB BCh, MD, MRCOG (Consultant in Maternal and Fetal Medicine)

      Affiliations

    • St George's Hospital, London, UK
    • Tel.: +44 2086720071, Fax: +44 2890235256.
  • ,
  • James C. Dornan, MD, FRCOG, FRCPI (Head of Department of Fetal Medicine)

      Affiliations

    • Queens University, Belfast, UK
    • Tel.: +44 2890634130, Fax: +44 2890235256.

published online 01 September 2009.

Foetal growth restriction is an important contributor to perinatal mortality, being responsible for up to 50% of stillbirths. Optimal prevention and accurate detection enabling timely intervention remain elusive, particularly in presumed low-risk pregnancy. Third trimester ultrasound seems a logical solution, but systematic review of evidence from randomised trials has shown that third trimester ultrasound does not have a significant impact on perinatal mortality but may increase interventions such as caesarean delivery. However, the evidence is difficult to interpret in the context of current obstetric practice as the evolution of ultrasound technology and rapid assimilation of newer techniques has resulted in questionable validity of the findings. If third trimester ultrasound were introduced routinely, there is a need to decide the optimal timing and number of examinations and what ultrasound parameters should be used to identify the foetus at risk.

Keywords: intrauterine growth restriction, foetal growth restriction, ultrasound, third trimester ultrasound, ultrasound screening

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-6934(09)00104-7

doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.08.003

Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 23, Issue 6 , Pages 833-844, December 2009