Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 369-374, June 2009

Neonatal near miss: a measure of the quality of obstetric care

  • Theunis Avenant, MBChB, MMed(Paed) (Senior Consultant)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel./Fax: +27 12 373 1009.

Department of Paediatrics, University of Pretoria and Kalafong Hospital, Private Bag X396, Pretoria 0001, South Africa

published online 12 January 2009.

Thirty-seven percent of under-five deaths occur in the neonatal period. Identifying and correcting factors that contribute to neonatal and maternal care are of the utmost importance. Evaluation of severe acute maternal morbidity, also known as “near miss”, is used to improve obstetric practice. Neonatal near miss in conjunction with neonatal mortality can be used in a similar fashion to identify deficiencies in care. No accepted definition of neonatal near miss currently exists. None of the neonatal morbidity scoring systems is applicable or appropriate for this purpose. Organ system based criteria are objective and allow for identifying severe morbidities and identifying primary causes. This system can be of use in a variety of settings to identify health system problems and to institute remedial action where necessary.

Keywords: pregnancy, neonatal morbidity, severe acute maternal morbidity, perinatal mortality

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-6934(08)00180-6

doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.12.005

Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 369-374, June 2009