Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 21, Issue 6 , Pages 915-929, December 2007

First-generation endometrial ablation: roller-ball vs loop vs laser

  • Nikolaos P. Papadopoulos, MD (Clinical Research Fellow)
  • ,
  • Adam Magos, BSc, MD, FRCOG (Consultant Gynaecologist)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence author. Tel.: +44 20 7431 1321, Fax: +44 20 7431 1321.

Minimally Invasive Therapy Unit & Endoscopy Training Centre, University Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, Hampstead, London NW3 2QG, UK

published online 06 April 2007.

Hysteroscopic guided or first generation endometrial ablation methods include transcervical endometrial resection, and rollerball and laser ablation. These techniques have been shown to be effective and safe alternatives to hysterectomy for dysfunctional uterine bleeding resulting in reduction in menstrual blood loss and dysmenorrhoea, correction of anaemia and improvement in quality of life. Compared with hysterectomy, treatment is associated with lower morbidity, shorter hospitalisation and faster recovery, and reduced treatment costs. As a result, the 1st generation ablation techniques are recognized as the “gold standard” ablation methods.

There are many similarities between the three techniques with respect to surgical principles and effectiveness. Certainly, menstrual improvement and patient satisfaction are similar with all three methods. In contrast, the complication profile of the three techniques is different, but surgical experience is arguably a much more important arbiter of patient safety than the technique itself.

Key words: endometrial ablation, resectoscope, first generation techniques, resectoscope, loop electrode, roller-ball, laser

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1521-6934(07)00071-5

doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.03.014

Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 21, Issue 6 , Pages 915-929, December 2007